requestId:684c3e3180b3d7.00107338.
“One nation”: The political and educational fantasy of Chinese classical civilization
Author: Chen Yun
Source: Author Authorization Confucian Network Published
Original from “Xinrui Zhou News” Issue 34
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and the 19th month of the Gengzi. Xinsi
[1] Originally, the family system and the authority system were two different types of arrangements, but the situation in traditional China was a combination of the two. The family system arrangement orientation makes the entire country be regarded as the family property and private property of the emperor, while officials who serve in the national rights system are regarded as retainers of the emperor, and the old affair of the country are regarded as the son of the emperor; and in the authority system of the residence, the official of the residence itself is regarded as the local official, and the basic affair under his rule is his son. “The household registration arrangements are all trying to force non-family sub-owners to serve their power without conditions, like the household registration organization, and regard all power as their personal property, just like household registration and family ownership, this is the inherent orientation of the household registration arrangement. Can the arranger do so To achieve this is a problem of power relations. “[2] But in China’s political system, it transcends the pure and upright family system, and even breaks with the pure and upright family system. “From a perspective, this can be said to be the most profound reality of power, and thereforeBraining love is a family-based official who is a family-based official—the holding of official duties is the ultimate break of the grace and letters of the monarch. ”[3]
Religion in China Religion and the World-Wiber Collection V
Wiber / Written by Kangle, Kuaimei / Translation
Guangxi Master Fan Dao Bookstore 2004-5
In Webo’s view, the reason why China’s authority cannot move towards a sensory path as a modern foundation is because it is always limited by its family system orientation. “The insensitive nature of China’s judicial administration is not caused by divine governance, but by family management.” [4] Thinking along Weiber’s path means that China’s political system cannot divide the differences between the country and the country and its foundation, thereby dividing the family’s reasons (traditional, customary, etc.)Entered the country’s system. This led to the division of public and private affairs and was invited by friends at the last moment. It cannot be presented in terms of conception and reorganization. Only then can we have the concept of treating the entire country and even the people as the personal property of the emperor. This is Weiber’s understanding of the civilization theory of traditional China’s “family and nation” politics. It is used to portray the positioning of Chinese civilization in broad historical events. The family reasons have extended to the national level, which makes the family a basis for national construction. Hegel also emphasized: “This is a country based on the foundation of family relations. The nature of this country can be further established. to raise a monthly price: it is moral. The basic element of this form is: it is a patriarchal relationship and family relationship原文. “The idea of no restriction on the plan found by Weiber was actually expressed in Hegel that the emperor “was regarded as a father, a clan leader, and had unrestricted power. …The authority of the authority was not limited. …The emperor himself exercised the highest, most profound and control of everything, and there were laws to exercise the rule accordingly, but these laws were 博官网 is not contrary to the will of the emperor, but to make all the people in the order according to his will. The bureau has a complete look like the father’s 博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网博官网� href=”https://twilovedating999.com/”>short-term maintenance sound.”[5] Hegel’s understanding is related to the beginning of his journey to China through the unrestrained concept of world history, that is, a person is unrestrained, and therefore there is no truly unrestrained historical element. Hegel’s fatherly imagination of the ruler can correspond to Veber’s statement: “The Landesvater is the fantasy of the family-owned country. Therefore, the family’s father’s ruler becomes the fosterer of the special ‘social policy’, and when it is sufficient, it must ensure that the son is approachable. When it has a good impression of it, it actually often pursues social welfare policies. “The emperor himself regards the whole nation as his son, loves the son, and is worried. The result of this awareness of the systemic system is the responsibility of family ownership – this is what Hegel and Veber understand about the “family and the whole country”.
-31.jpg!article_800_auto)
World History and Philosophy Seminar
[Germany] Hegel / Written by Liu Liqun, Shen Zhen, Zhang Dongxiu, Yao Yan / Translation
Business Printing Library 2015-5
The above understanding has noticed some of the characteristics of the “family and nation-wide” system, especially the tension with its recent representative sentiment. It cannot be said that it has certain justice, or even in-depth, but it is not sufficient and has not yet shown the understanding developed from Chinese thinking itself. “Since Qin and Han, feudalism has changed and counties have one county, and ten thousand people have been established. The benefits and diseases are determined by one word, and it is difficult for the ministers to approach it.” [6] In this case, the concept of treating the whole country as the family of the emperor has emerged, as it happened in Liubang, but this kind of view has emerged. Thoughts are definitely not an explanation of the “best country”. The most basic explanation cannot explain the existence of traditional China’s thousands of years of ductility. In fact, China before the sixteenth century, in terms of its influence on civilization, it existed as the most important area of world history. What’s more, in essence, no political system can be based on the foundation of “private country”. It is actually a serious misunderstanding to explain “border country” with “private country”. The problem with Hegel and Veber in understanding the Chinese political system is that they do not develop from the internal rational path of Chinese thinking, but from the “broad history” situation of self-understanding in the Eastern Times on the level of civilization, giving a leading man in Europe In this image of the Chinese civilization that occupies a stern position in the world history, the “family nation” has been downgraded to the first place to become the “private nation” system of the emperor’s willful and unrestrained “private nation” system, or perhaps in the words of Weibo, it has become a rule that does not violate the traditional conditions. href=”https://tw98findmylove.org/”>Long-term maintenance wanton system.
Back to the theme of “Family and the Country”, “Greetings·Greetings” gives you the understanding of the way to move forward from the traditional Chinese thinking. “Travel” sets the concept of “the whole country is for the public” and “the whole country is for the family”. “The whole country is public” is regarded as an expression of the great Taoist journey, and Tao has a noble status in Chinese thinking, which can be said to beTo be a public nation is the concept of Chinese politics. When Zheng Xuan matched the “national affairs as public” with the Five Emperors’ era and the “national affairs as family” with the three generations, the two were developed into the Chinese civilization memory in the same way as a historical event, but this historical event was absolutely non-linear, and “national affairs as family” was not a replacement for “national affairs as public”. Things are just obvious and inconsistent differences in the influence of the Dao; “the whole country is a family” is not a confrontation of “the whole country is public”, and it is not a “public”, that is, a “home”, or once “the whole country is a family”, it cannot be as good as “the whole country is public”, in the mainstream interpretation of the past, from Integrate softwareThe “th
發佈留言